🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency sparked by the introduction of a new 28-point plan for achieving ceasefire appeared – temporarily – to have been stabilised. A Washington representative spoke of "notable headway" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its retaliation: a renewed assault of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Negotiation and Warfare

The succession of contrasting events captured the harsh reality of the outgoing year. By day, diplomatic battles are waged: optimistic declarations are issued from different nations. Considerable effort is expended on managing specific proposals. By night, Moscow forcefully demonstrates the world that, for them, war remains the key method for achieving "resolution".

Nighttime Reality

As military strikes unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's defenselessness was laid bare. Ukraine is capable of detecting missile launches from enemy soil, a capacity enabled by current data. From vantage locations, defense planes that had been dispatched to counter approaching cruise missiles flew past – advanced fighter aircraft delivered to Ukraine by NATO members.

Shortly after, Kyiv's anti-aircraft weapons thundered: several firings fired to intercept a hostile projectile. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, most likely delivered by allied countries. Every firing creates sudden vibrations, causing tremors. The moment of terror quickly gives way to sober acceptance: maybe the approaching threat won't strike its target this time, protecting urban areas from catastrophe and additional electricity failures.

Persistent Threats

Following this, a automatic firearm engaged a aerial vehicle somewhere nearby, part of a defensive team – almost certainly allied-provided weaponry. Sadly, the shots failed to hit the opposing UAV – it maintained course toward its target.

Periodically, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv greeted the daybreak reports: seven people killed, damage and infrastructure problems in many homes as a result of the night's assault. As always, everyone still maintained normal activities – living the war. But those full day demonstrated Ukraine's essential dependence on international aid – a dependence that neighboring countries are evidently unprepared to substitute in the short term.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The detailed framework from Washington generated strong feelings, debate and serious worry – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after previous diplomatic encounters and bilateral conferences.

Every new proposal from Washington follows the same pattern: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, effectively counters. They manage the tension but never actually achieve victory. This pattern will, no doubt, endure.

Tactical Assessments

It is convenient to criticize specific actors of persistently promoting Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. US administration operates on a assumption familiar among international relations experts: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have lost on the battlefield. The American government believes that it is unrealistic to force Russia to abandon the territory that it presently holds in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The problem is that while accepting these circumstances, American administration does nothing to deter Moscow, through statements or actions, from believing that the status quo will not evolve additionally in its favour in the months ahead.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, Moscow is convinced that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its allies are approaching exhaustion. Their incentive to agree to terms that does not give them the maximum possible gain is virtually nonexistent. There may be numerous efforts to end hostilities, but they will persist as long as Russia's government remains highly assured in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still endure, gradually sacrificing people and territory but preventing a entire defensive failure until circumstances change in its benefit.

Existing Situation

Objectively, there are no actual prerequisites for a armistice. Now, individual motivations are becoming relevant: leadership ambitions to negotiate peace and secure international recognition, and Ukrainian leadership's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the country's interests against any proposal Kyiv finds unsuitable, so that their focus does not switch to homefront challenges. And although their objective will now be considerably more difficult after latest incidents, it remains quite doubtful that this will modify their basic position.

These two forces are guiding negotiations.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a just a single week to terminate the 28 points of the most recent proposal. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by Washington, pushback by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with calming attempts of diplomats, and finally, current information leaks, all achieved their purpose.

While new proposals based on old ideas are approaching, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off negotiation assaults from Washington that are rooted in Kremlin requirements and show certain reluctance to modify developments, if they remain united and strengthen their defence capabilities at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to defend against evening bombardments will, for the foreseeable future, largely rely on sustained allied backing.